Nación

Moore becomes irreverent on appeal brief

In strong terms that border on disrespect, fiscal third-corruption, Zuleyka Moore, appealed yesterday's decision, Enrique Paniza...

The third anti-corruption prosecutor, Zuleyka Moore sends the record of the purchase of radars with a term up to four months. / Archive
The third anti-corruption prosecutor, Zuleyka Moore sends the record of the purchase of radars with a term up to four months. / Archive

In strong terms that border on disrespect, fiscal third-corruption, Zuleyka Moore, appealed yesterday's decision, Enrique Paniza, criminal fifth judge to cancel part of investigations into the Finmeccanica case and replace the preventive detention Jose Raul Mulino and Alejandro Garuz.

Moore accused the judge Paniza to use standards "disuse" take "arbitrary" decision, incurring "lack of judicial ethics" and use "fallacies" to support his decision.

Moore said it was "unacceptable" the judge's decision based on a "biased" study legal developments.

 
He added that Paniza made a decision that does not fit right and in the same cited legal rules are obsolete.

"Gentlemen judges, society expects answers on investigations concerning crimes against public administration were carried out from January 2015 to maintain the pronouncement of criminal fifth judge is ignoring the serious damage that these crimes caused," he said Moore in his appeal.

Paniza decided to cancel part of the investigation being conducted by Moore in the case Finmeccanica, considering that the tax violated the rights of Mulino and Garuz to further investigate when he was defeated terms.

 
While litigator and former head of the Center for Reception of Complaints of the Deputy Attorney General of the Republic attorney, Ronier Ortiz, said the law prohibits investigating officials refer to judges and magistrates in disrespectful terms.

"Those are kicking strangled. She will give you a palera in Superior Court because they (prosecutors) as if they were right," said Ortiz, one of the lawyers defending the former Minister of Public Security Jose Raul Mulino .

He added that the prosecution is expired term of summary, requested extension and this was won, making him the legal figure of contempt.

 

"Against judges and prosecutors can not be filed vulgar, disrespectful and intransigent written. That prohibited by law," the lawyer told law.

Moore explained that the prosecutor may be the subject of a complaint against him for the way he referred to the judge Paniza.

He noted that if an investigating officer does not agree with a court decision, should only appeal because the law grants such authority, but not to speak in the media as the procurator Porcell Kenya.

 
He said that what made the head of the tax was to question the actions of a judge, so that denounced.

Between overruled by the judge Paniza are orders investigation, the arrest of former Minister Mulino and a technical due diligence with radars.

Moore was the deadline expired on September 22, 2015, after eight months extension granted by the court office, however, referred the case to the end of January this year.

According to Paniza, the term expired violated constitutional guarantees and the proceedings against the accused, and decided to cancel all actions taken since September 22, 2015.


Camacho denuncia a la jefa de los fiscales por abuso de autoridad

Una denuncia por abuso de autoridad e infracción de los deberes como servidora pública fue interpuesta en contra de la procuradora general de la nación, Kenia Porcell, tras la declaración que hizo en un medio televisivo, en la que cuestiona el fallo del juez Enrique Paniza que anula parcialmente la investigación en el caso de los radares por pasarse del término de instrucción. La denuncia fue presentada ante la Procuraduría de la Administración por el vocero del partido Cambio Democrático, Luis Eduardo Camacho, quien destacó que las declaraciones de Kenia Porcell violan el artículo 355 del Código Penal, que establece sanciones de hasta dos años de prisión.

Dijo que al hacer estas declaraciones, la procuradora amparó que se cometan ilegalidades en los despachos de instrucción del Ministerio Público, además constituye una injerencia en las investigaciones que realizan los fiscales. Agregó que con ello se están violando las normas del Código Judicial.


fecha edicion
old id
1017922
Fecha y hora de publicación

101 años de Panamá América

 
101 años Panamá América