The performance of the Supreme Court of Justice (CSJ) by failing to declare prevented from solving or preventive in favor of former President Ricardo Martinelli is a clear violation of the American Convention on Human Rights and all the covenants and conventions signed by the State Panamanian deputy defense lawyers consider the Central American Parliament (PARLACEN).
Lawyers Alejandro Perez and Sidney Sitton, who are part of the defense team of the former president of Panama, argue that this kind of action the end leaves misplaced, globally, to Panama on respect for human rights.
Perez argues that this shows that in Panama there is only selective justice, but on justice this is a wild state.
The lawyer wields his argument stating that the judges of the Court ordered the arrests themselves reject. While judges act as prosecutors, judges and warranty Added to that they are single-instance courts.
"Everything was agreed, agreed and agreed in the American Convention on Human Rights in 1977 and ratified in 1993 during the government of Guillermo Endara, that we we pushed us to fulfill all the provisions of the American Convention, its judgments and jurisprudence, the opinions, requests, all that has gone pique, "says the lawyer.
For Perez, in Panama it is disrespecting all agreed and especially at a time when the members of the Supreme Court are being questioned by different sectors.
"Some say that all members of the Court should be judged, which is facing a discredited Court," he stresses.
For exviceministro Government also, the judges had declared disabled and then solve it.
"The detention of Ricardo Martinelli is totally illegal because the record there is absolutely nothing any part or textual evidence linking him to punctures In addition, he has not been notified;. There was was a maneuver to say it was notified and what came was a hoax, in another country a judge to do this should be in jail, "Perez summarizes the performance of judges.
Meanwhile, Sidney Sitton says that when this case is addressed by the Inter-American System "is going to realize that it is the most absurd, most ridiculous of the administration of justice worldwide."
"They should all be declared disabled as did the magistrate Fábrega" poses Sittón while questioning the fact that there is no difference between the position of the magistrate and the rest, so they all had to have their deputies.
Sitton, who describes the action of something unusual, said that by not declaring prevented the chief magistrates and allow them to be alternates who would take the decision on remand is going against the Adversarial Criminal Justice System that seeks that the process is not contaminated.
