Resolution to take Mr. Mizrachi out of Colombia violated due process

The order of expulsion from Colombian territory processed against Mayer Mizrachi, after his release, has aroused strong suspicions about the hidden intentions by the Panamanian diplomacy.It became known that there was an order of expulsion on the part of Colombian migration officials while Mayer Mizrachi was still detained, putting before the requirements that should normally be followed in this process.Lawyer Silvio Guerra told Panama America that it was on 20 June this year, that the Secretariat of the Second Court of Justice had sent the thirteenth judge Lina Oviedo, a note to inform that the extradition and arrest warrant against Mizrachi had been revoked, which was approved on last 6 June.But on 21 June, a day later, the judge leading the case referred a statement on the decision of revocation to FR Minister Isabel de Saint Malo, and the latter one forwarded it to the Colombian Foreign Relations Ministry to rescind the detention order, and based on this an expulsion be ordered.Although apparently before 21 June, Colombian migration officials had already expelled Mr. Mizrachi of the country, while he was still detained and with no prior knowledge of his release."If the Colombian migration officers would expell him by 21 June, because it is the date that the resolution of expulsion carries, we have to conclude that it violated the Panamanian request for extradition and arrest," stressed the lawyer.He added that "it may be an evidence that there was foreknowledge that detention would be revoked", and that there must have been some kind of understanding between Panamanian and Colombian authorities to bring Mizrachi handcuffed and forcibly."If the order was revocation, Mayer Mizrachi was at liberty to come to Panama, without any intimidation or threat against him," said the legal defense of the genius of computer science.This situation motivated Even a complaint for "an evil plan against Mizrachi, for which the highest authorities in the diplomatic affairs must respond to Panama".The legal defense of Mr. Mizrachi said that "the initial intention was to return the young entrepreneur to Panama, but with all the skirmish that came about, now a political asylum is going to be requested for which Mr.  Mizrachi´s return to Panama shall remain in suspense, and should he be notified, asylum must be given priority".Previously, FR Minister Isabel de Saint Malo had said that: "the information we have on the part of the judiciary is that Mr. Mizrachi would have 48 hours to be notified in Panama," said the FR Minister.However, lawyer Silvio Guerra said that in this case file there is no indictment request. "I want to say to the Minister that 'Shoemaker to your shoes', judicial matter is up to the Supreme Court, you cannot get into the judiciary.